Recreational Fishing Rules Simplified

Norman Moore today announced changes to recreational fishing rules to make them more uniform across the state. The changes can be viewed by going to Media Statements Norman Moore.


chris raff's picture

Posts: 3257

Date Joined: 09/02/10

Fisheries Minister Norman

Tue, 2012-12-18 13:35

Fisheries Minister Norman Moore today announced Western Australian recreational fishing rules would be made a lot simpler following a major review.

 

The review included extensive consultation with WA’s recreational fishing community which provided more than 900 public submissions. 

 

Mr Moore said he supported Recfishwest’s recommendations developed from the consultation.

 

“Currently there is a myriad of different rules across four different regions, whereas the new rules will apply on a State-wide basis and removes many of the significant variations that exist between the regions,” he said.

 

“The changes will remove the complexity of the existing regime.  For example, the existing 13 finfish bag limits categories will be cut to four new resource-based categories across the State covering demersal, pelagic, nearshore/estuarine and fresh water.

 

 

Key changes include:

  • Large pelagic fish - mixed bag limit of three fish across WA
  • Demersal species - mixed bag limit of five outside the West Coast Bioregion
  • Nearshore and estuarine fish - mixed bag limit of 16 across WA
  • Freshwater - mixed bag limit of four
  • Standard bag limit of two barramundi across WA
  • Standard bag limit of eight for all rock lobster species across the State
  • Possession limits - no use of commercial couriers to transport unaccompanied fish
  • Simplifying the rules of processing/filleting at sea and how they are landed.

The new rules come into effect from the beginning of February 2013.

 

“This outcome shows the recreational fishing community is willing to co-operate to improve the fishing experience for everyone in Western Australia,” the Minister said

____________________________________________________________________________

Intelligence is like a four-wheel drive. It only allows you to get stuck in more remote places.”

dumper's picture

Posts: 1027

Date Joined: 03/04/08

 Wtf?? We've been bent over

Tue, 2012-12-18 14:28

 Wtf?? We've been bent over again

scottnofish's picture

Posts: 1621

Date Joined: 28/08/07

yep screwed again

Tue, 2012-12-18 15:00

 http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/Documents/recreational_fishing/rec_fishing_guide/rules_guide_statewide.pdf

sunshine's picture

Posts: 2641

Date Joined: 03/03/09

Makes bringing a feed back from NW

Tue, 2012-12-18 15:05

By road a little harder unless you have a portable freezer or drive really quick.  I usually bring back a few ( not lots and never over 10kg) coral trout fillets but have used a professional freezer truck to ensure they retain perfect condition - oh well Engel sales will be boosted  

Posts: 104

Date Joined: 09/09/09

Sorry, but i disagree...

Tue, 2012-12-18 15:33

I don't really see how we've been screwed over?

Recreational fishers were given ample opportunity to have their say (900 people actually bothered), and infact many of the original proposals were adjusted according to community feedback...i don't see that as 'being screwed' myself.

 

Posts: 102

Date Joined: 09/03/09

I think it's fair.  They have

Tue, 2012-12-18 15:39

I think it's fair. 

 

They have done a good job in simplifying the rules and put it into an easy to follow booklet.

 

Not all limits have been reduced, increase in pelagics to transfer some of the pressure off slow growing demersals.

 

Putting Spanish Flag and Charlie Courts in a seperate category to the prized demersal fish was a good idea. As well as raising the limit of Black Snapper to 5 to keep Shark Bag Gulf fisho's happy.

Posts: 6454

Date Joined: 08/08/11

 i havent seen the detail,

Tue, 2012-12-18 15:57

 i havent seen the detail, but if what you say is accurate then they sound like good changes.  particularly as i fish shark bay every year ;)

____________________________________________________________________________

Fish! HARD!

Posts: 457

Date Joined: 03/09/10

Screwed over

Tue, 2012-12-18 16:33

I don't think. We have all had our chance at putting in a submission so don't whinge.

Theonly little possession limit I do not understand is the limit of "4" freshwater fish which includes Redfin, this I cannot get my head around especially as they are "VERMIN" and theres no throwing them back.

Some one got that wrong....

In finishing, I think the ones that this may upset are a taj greedy, Maybe?????

sarcasm0's picture

Posts: 1396

Date Joined: 25/06/09

?

Tue, 2012-12-18 17:05

 

grayzeee's picture

Posts: 2283

Date Joined: 09/07/09

Looks to me that metro

Tue, 2012-12-18 16:41

Looks to me that metro fishers get one extra pelagic fish in the mixed bag limit and 4 extra in the medium risk (near shore and estuarine) mixed bag limit.  

 

____________________________________________________________________________

If I spent half as long fishing , as I do reading this bloody forum , I'd be twice the fisherman I am. 

fisho-ron's picture

Posts: 2539

Date Joined: 26/09/09

am i miss reading somewhere,

Tue, 2012-12-18 16:42

am i miss reading somewhere, or have some of the boat limits been lifted?

i know dhu's are still 2 per boat, but if i had 4 lic holders on board i can have 2 dhu's and 6 pinkys or 8 pinkys and no dhu?

cheers

Posts: 6454

Date Joined: 08/08/11

I'd be happy to be faced with

Tue, 2012-12-18 17:41

I'd be happy to be faced with that problem one day..... (that is having to decide if I am nearing a bag or boat limit) ;S

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Fish! HARD!

Willlo's picture

Posts: 1490

Date Joined: 07/10/11

Think you can have 2 Demersal

Tue, 2012-12-18 17:30

Think you can have 2 Demersal each and no more than 2 Dhu per boat,so 2 on the boat means 1 Dhu each and another Demersal ie pinky or baldy each, or 2 pinks each or a  mixed bag of 2 demersal.Doesnt look like much has changed re demersals Think you have it right fisho - ron ?

____________________________________________________________________________

 Call Sign - BZ785

Haynes Hunter Prowler CC

 

sea-kem's picture

Posts: 15100

Date Joined: 30/11/09

 Simplified???? Seems

Tue, 2012-12-18 17:50

 Simplified???? Seems everyone's confused already.

____________________________________________________________________________

Love the West!

grantarctic1's picture

Posts: 2546

Date Joined: 03/03/11

Agree

Tue, 2012-12-18 21:22

Yeah real simple,  anyone know a lawyer who likes to fish ? cause iv'e got a spot on my boat for him/her.

 

Posts: 61

Date Joined: 07/04/10

Im still a little confused

Tue, 2012-12-18 18:00

Im still a little confused but bit simpler as its on a statewide basis. But just something that has always got me confused, if I have 3 people on board each of whom are licensed how many demersals can I have? I'm pretty sure 2 dhuies is max regardless but what about pinkies and baldies?

anypuddle's picture

Posts: 597

Date Joined: 22/01/12

limits

Tue, 2012-12-18 18:15

3 licensed fishermen = 6 demersals of which 2 could be dhuies.

  ie= 2 dhu 4 baldie    (or whatever mix of demersals you got (2 each))

      or no dhu and 6 in total of baldies or pinkies, black ass,  or whatever (2 each per fisho)

____________________________________________________________________________

Anywhere anytime

anypuddle's picture

Posts: 597

Date Joined: 22/01/12

limits

Tue, 2012-12-18 18:15

3 licensed fishermen = 6 demersals of which 2 could be dhuies.

  ie= 2 dhu 4 baldie    (or whatever mix of demersals you got (2 each))

      or no dhu and 6 in total of baldies or pinkies, black ass,  or whatever (2 each per fisho)

____________________________________________________________________________

Anywhere anytime

anypuddle's picture

Posts: 597

Date Joined: 22/01/12

sweet double post

Tue, 2012-12-18 18:16

might as well make it 3

____________________________________________________________________________

Anywhere anytime

fisho-ron's picture

Posts: 2539

Date Joined: 26/09/09

so they have removed some of

Tue, 2012-12-18 18:20

so they have removed some of the other boat limits?

edit: my bad, i thought there was a boat limit of 4 pinkys, but i just looked on the old rules and no boat limit.

 

Justo82's picture

Posts: 482

Date Joined: 17/10/11

 But it says mixed bag limit

Tue, 2012-12-18 20:29

 But it says mixed bag limit of 5 demersals. How's that 2 per person? Or am I reading it wrong. 

MattMiller's picture

Posts: 4171

Date Joined: 15/06/09

Yes

Tue, 2012-12-18 20:32

but only out side of the West Coast zone

West Coast zone is 2 demersals per person

craigb's picture

Posts: 57

Date Joined: 15/08/10

so for west coast nothing has

Tue, 2012-12-18 21:05

so for west coast nothing has changed as usual. Am i wrong

Leemo's picture

Posts: 3712

Date Joined: 22/02/07

 supposed to be more uniform

Tue, 2012-12-18 21:07

 supposed to be more uniform across the state. Missed that mark. 

____________________________________________________________________________

bludgin' since 94'

Justo82's picture

Posts: 482

Date Joined: 17/10/11

 Just read it on the

Tue, 2012-12-18 21:34

 Just read it on the fisheries site and now it all makes sense.  

Posts: 423

Date Joined: 30/09/05

 For the West Coast

Tue, 2012-12-18 22:49

 For the West Coast bioregion, nothing much has changed. Still 2 demersals per lisence. You can however keep an extra pelagic / shark now though, and they've removed individual bag limits from pelagics, so you can keep up to 3 of any pelagic (apart from Marlin, Sailfish & Swordfish).

For the rest of the state, the limits have been altered a fair bit more. Previously pelagics and demersals were grouped together and you could take a max of 7 'high risk sp'. Now you can have 5 demersals, and 3 pelagics, so for you guys saying you've been 'screwed' I dont see how? 

You'll also notice that Mulloway, Threadfin, Mangrove Jack, Barramundi etc are no longer classified as 'high risk', but now as 'near shore/estuarine'. So if you really want, you can go out, catch 5 demersals, 3 pelagics and up to 16 of these inshore species (provided you dont go over bag limits for individual sp.).
 

I have noticed however that harlequin fish (Othos dentex) are no longer mentioned in the rules. It used to list them under Cods (family Serranidae), but it now classifies cods as Family Epinephelidae, which harlequin are not. I guess harlequins must be free for all then hey? 

chris raff's picture

Posts: 3257

Date Joined: 09/02/10

KG's have gone from 8 to 12

Wed, 2012-12-19 07:02

KG's have gone from 8 to 12 as well...

____________________________________________________________________________

Intelligence is like a four-wheel drive. It only allows you to get stuck in more remote places.”

Brucesta's picture

Posts: 1721

Date Joined: 29/05/09

it's pretty simple to me. up

Wed, 2012-12-19 08:36

it's pretty simple to me. up north it's a mixed bag of demersals of 5 down from 7. you can then take up to the allowed individual limits to make that 5. 1 trout, 2 rankins and 2 reds. when it comes down to grouped species anything with an asterix means you can take up to the individual limit of those, say you get 5 Emperors, you can take 3 Spangos and 2 Red Throats, thats your 5 done or say 1 coral trout, 1 bar cheek coral trout and say 3 bluebone.

nice to see we can keep 3 Reds per angler instead of 2 but Karratha/Hedland has lost it's little 2 Trout bonus we had which sucks as some times it's not hard to get a few when they are on the chew. I like the 800mm max rule for Barramundi and the 2 max possesion limit state wide, smart move to protect the breeding stock and i see that they have made note of no limits for yellowtail scads and needleskin queenies for us northern billfishers. no complaints here in the end. As daniel Y said, get your 5 demersals and your 3 mackies and you have your fillets for the travellers of you out there.

____________________________________________________________________________

Las Vegas - Rolling the dice and trying your luck. 1M+ Barra summer target. 100kg Black Marlin winter target

Posts: 127

Date Joined: 17/01/12

Careful with trout

Wed, 2012-12-19 09:02

Can't have one barcheek and one coral trout. They are grouped together under Plectopomus spp.

Coronation are seperate now though, so you can have one barcheek and one coronation.

Brucesta's picture

Posts: 1721

Date Joined: 29/05/09

http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/Doc

Wed, 2012-12-19 10:29

http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/Documents/recreational_fishing/rec_fishing_guide/rules_guide_statewide.pdf

page 7 and page 4 explain it mate, they are captured as a group of species not just a Coral Trout.

Tuskfish, Coral Trout, Cod, Emperors, Fox Fish, Pig Fish, Red Fish and Tropical Snapper & Seaperch are groups, individual limits apply to each fish be it 1, 2 or 3 depending to your mixed bag limit.

____________________________________________________________________________

Las Vegas - Rolling the dice and trying your luck. 1M+ Barra summer target. 100kg Black Marlin winter target

Posts: 127

Date Joined: 17/01/12

Good pickup!

Wed, 2012-12-19 10:36

Wow, that is a bit of a step change from previous rules! Not easily understood, but the example with emporer makes it easier.

Posts: 457

Date Joined: 03/09/10

Correct me

Wed, 2012-12-19 19:56

if I'm wrong, but outside the WCD zone, in regards to Dhuys, it doesn't matter how many there are fishing on the boat, they can have 1 dhuy each.

fisho-ron's picture

Posts: 2539

Date Joined: 26/09/09

boat limit of 2 dhuy mate no

Wed, 2012-12-19 20:45

boat limit of 2 dhuy mate no matter what

Tim's picture

Posts: 2497

Date Joined: 26/09/06

West Coast Zone

Wed, 2012-12-19 20:57

Ron - reading the rules the boat limit of Dhu only applies in the West Coast Zone.

Rest of the state has no boat limit on these.

Posts: 457

Date Joined: 03/09/10

In Regards

Wed, 2012-12-19 21:42

to the boundarys of the WCD zone there may be some contention for boatys launching from Augusta and fishing past the sthn boundary.

Ok if you launch at Windy Harbour.

Maybe the boundary needs to move to Chatham Island seeing there is dhuys regulary caught there in No's. JAT

MattMiller's picture

Posts: 4171

Date Joined: 15/06/09

That has always

Thu, 2012-12-20 05:08

been the case Squidder and precisely why fisheries originally placed the boundary EAST of Augusta.

Basically if you launch at Augusta you are fishing in the west coast zone.

Posts: 457

Date Joined: 03/09/10

Some boatys

Thu, 2012-12-20 06:02

actually fish outside the WCD zone Matt by travelling past the boundary being Black Point or Cape Beaufort.

It's been mentioned before when the closed season is on in the WCD zone and boatys launching from Augusta, in a decent boat that is, can fish outside the closed area but cannot land their fish in Augusta, the protected ones that is.

We all know the Donnelly Banks is a massive breeding ground which is outside the WCD zone which can be reached from Augusta.

It's a FD blunder.

fisho-ron's picture

Posts: 2539

Date Joined: 26/09/09

thanks tim.didnt even look at

Thu, 2012-12-20 06:25

thanks tim.

didnt even look at that, i thought it was across the board, learn something new every day!!

Cruise Control's picture

Posts: 972

Date Joined: 03/11/10

So does this mean that we can

Thu, 2012-12-20 16:41

So does this mean that we can only take the equivalent of 2 x licences and that the limit for the boat ?

 

Boat limit

In addition to bag limits there are also boat

limits. A boat limit is the maximum number of

fish of a species or group of species that may be

on a boat or attached to a boat at any one time.

On day trips in powered boats, there must be two

or more Recreational Fishing from Boat Licence

(RFBL) holders on board to take a boat limit. This

includes boats used for recreational crabbing.

 

This year fishing in Coral Bay, with 4 anglers on board I could (not that I did) take 7 fish per angler with a boat limit of 21 fish. If I read the above correctly that now becomes a boat limit of 10 fish ?

Posts: 423

Date Joined: 30/09/05

 I think that only applies to

Thu, 2012-12-20 22:31

 I think that only applies to species with boat limits already; ie Dhufish, Crabs, Squid. 

So in coral bay, if you have your 4 licensed fishers on board, you can take 20 demersal fish (5 each). If you have 6 fishers on board you can have 30 demersals.

However, if you are catching squid for example, you may only take a max of 30 squid for your whole boat, regardless of how many people are fishing on board.

Paul G's picture

Posts: 5215

Date Joined: 12/12/07

All the year and posts on the

Fri, 2012-12-21 05:21

All the year and posts on the subject and ,you still get confused ,did any off you guys go to school. Can't see how we got screwed .all looks good to me .We've all known for some time that the limit outside the west coast zone,was going to change.most people go north and feed most there fish to the sharks anyways.

____________________________________________________________________________

Active Gyp-Rok solutions ,Residential  and commercial ceilings and walls