Dawsville cut fails

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/wa/18534680/peel-harvey-estuary-a-toxic-mess/

Ref: Rhianna King, The West Australian Updated August 17, 2013, 2:40 am

Toxic black sludge in Mandurah's fragile Peel-Harvey estuary has reached levels unseen anywhere else in the world, research has found, amid suggestions the Dawesville Cut is failing to alleviate algal growth and nutrient build-up.

And a separate investigation has found the estuary is returning to the state it was in before the $57 million cut was created, and warns its rehabilitation is unlikely under existing management.

Almost 20 years after the completion of the Dawesville Cut, designed to flush out algae and excessive nutrients, the waterways are plagued by toxic algal blooms and sulphidic black sediment.

A four-year study funded by the Australian Research Council, to be completed next year, has uncovered unprecedented levels of black sulphidic ooze, which can cause deoxygenation and lead to fish deaths.

Lead researcher Richard Bush, from Southern Cross University, said the rapid development in the region was a contributor to the build-up of black sediment and phosphorous, caused by fertilisers.

"It's an incredibly toxic material that is accumulating very fast. The concentration of sulphide exceeds any of the reported levels we've seen in similar environments across the world," he said.

Professor Bush said the Dawesville Cut "definitely doesn't seem to have fixed the problem in terms of toxic sediments".

A separate report, to be released by Murdoch University in conjunction with CSIRO, WA Marine Science Institution and WA Fisheries, found the health of the estuary was at a "critical juncture" and action was needed to prevent further decline.

Sarah Metcalf, from Murdoch's school of management and governance, said housing values, tourism and recreation were at stake as the condition deteriorated.

The report highlighted flaws in the management of the estuary, with overlapping jurisdictions and fragmented administration resulting in "weak or non-existent" monitoring.

Jan Star, chairwoman of the Peel-Harvey Catchment Council, said the estuary was being neglected. "The pressure to put more urban development down there is only going to increase the nutrient load going into the river," she said.

Department of Water science branch manager Malcolm Robb said the problem was in the upper reaches of the estuary, near the Murray and Serpentine rivers.

Substantially less flushing from the rivers contributed to the nutrient loads. Marine scientists were investigating reports of increased black mud and algae.
"Livestock grazing, dairies, horticulture, urban development and septic tanks all contribute to the problem of nutrient loading," Mr Robb said.

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/wa/18534680/peel-harvey-estuary-a-toxic-mess/

____________________________________________________________________________

Angling tourism is worth $10 billion to the Australian economy - 90000 jobs; more than any sport; spread the word


Posts: 216

Date Joined: 04/04/13

what they missed was

Thu, 2013-09-26 17:13

The salt which the cut has introduced into the system.

Look around, all the paperbarks are dead or dying.

How is that an improvement ?

Posts: 5981

Date Joined: 17/06/10

If you think it is bad now wait untill they dredge it

Thu, 2013-09-26 21:48

The estuary is on death row right now, wait until the proposed dredging for the development at Point Grey gets done and then Point grey is built. I believe that sample drill holes have show that dredging the new channel from the cut across to Point Grey will uncover sulphide soils and no-one can predict the effect that will have on the entire estuary system.
The proposed channel will be the death blow, but don't let that idea stand in the way of the "lets make a buck developer"
Onward and upward damn the ecology and life style of the now residence, let them eat cake

rant over

Posts: 1336

Date Joined: 05/05/06

Cant wait to go crabbing down

Fri, 2013-09-27 00:03

Cant wait to go crabbing down there this summer.

 

____________________________________________________________________________

Bend over

Posts: 457

Date Joined: 03/09/10

It's all about

Tue, 2013-10-29 06:20

a few that like things to suit them at the COST of the estuarys health.
What people forget...the water is forced into the estuary through the cut..but..then it only drains out. This will leave a high concentrate of salt{as previously mentioned] and force any sediment further up the estuary.

Nothing short of a FK up

Flow control gates should have been installed at the bridge during construction

tailor marc's picture

Posts: 2979

Date Joined: 27/09/06

I acually thought for years

Tue, 2013-10-29 08:11

I acually thought for years after the cut was made that everything was so much better, so many more crabs, the fishing around the cuts was fantastic. The amount of dolphins , rays, fish going in and out seemed like the cut was a god send. Starting to think otherwise now

____________________________________________________________________________

My photography pictures... http://westernhorizonsmedia.wordpress.com/

 

 

grantarctic1's picture

Posts: 2546

Date Joined: 03/03/11

I thought the same

Tue, 2013-10-29 10:17

I thought the same thing Marc. I remember the mess before the cut was put through, and it certainly cleaned up alot for many years. But it was designed to deal with the problem for the population at the time. I don't see it as the cut has failed, i think it is people and developers who have failed. What do they expect when they build endless cannels and houses right on the waters edge, who all want lush green lawn and pristine gardens.

They have over developed the whole area, without considering how the cut would cope with flushing out all the polution from housing etc . IMO .

Posts: 875

Date Joined: 30/12/09

 imagine what it would be

Tue, 2013-10-29 10:35

 imagine what it would be like if they didnt put the cut in. it may not have fixed the problem but i reckon it slowed it down. i remember when you use to have to walk through the thick green sludge out the back from the miami caravan park for a couple of hundred of meters before you could see the bottom. there were areas like this all the way through the estuary. imagine it now with out the cut and still have the same amount off nutrients washing into the system. what about the old mozzie truck coming through the caravan parks everynight with the fogger to try and control the mozzies i havent seen one around for a very long time.

 

____________________________________________________________________________

 Get busy living, or get busy dying!

crasny1's picture

Posts: 7003

Date Joined: 16/10/08

Its Has made a difference then

Thu, 2013-10-31 15:21

and probably now. I have been living and fishing in and around mandurah before and after the cut and fully agree with eziliving. But also it has led to an expansion in housing because it no longer smelled and was a healthier ecosystem.

I do believe that it might be close to saturation point again, but making it sound like a disaster is scaremongering.

 

____________________________________________________________________________

"I would like to die on Mars. Just not on impact!!" _ Elon Musk

MandurahMatt's picture

Posts: 613

Date Joined: 18/09/13

 I don't believe it !!

Fri, 2013-11-01 06:49

 I don't believe it !! Pre-cut it was shocking stunk real bad sludge all around the shore line, none of thease visable signs have returned !

____________________________________________________________________________

 Bewdey Fellaz